View Single Post
Old 04-17-08, 09:43 PM
  #8  
Pompiere
Senior Member
 
Pompiere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,423

Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked 1,009 Times in 517 Posts
Originally Posted by sekaijin
Maybe this is obvious, but you can also reduce the reach by moving the saddle forward.
Moving the saddle forward can introduce some other problems with your pelvic region, since you are changing the reletive angle of your hips to the pedals.

Changing to a shorter stem does change the weight distribution toward the rear slightly, and it also gives you slightly less leverage to turn the bars. I have three bikes set up that way and I have never had a problem. I will take the twitchier handling over the pain in the back from the too long stem. The old thumb rule was if you couldn't see your hub because it was blocked by the handlebar, you were good for stem length.
Pompiere is offline