View Single Post
Old 10-10-04, 10:32 PM
  #14  
jimhens714
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rocklin, CA
Posts: 158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Michel Gagnon
The last poster highlighted the major differences that exist in theory between "women bikes" (or WSD) and "men bikes".
In theory, the top tube of a woman bike should be shorter than the top tube of a man bike of the same size. But that's not always the case.

Moreover, the bike shop could "womanise" any bike to a point by installing a shorter stem, a woman saddle, narrow handlebars, and short cranks. The stem and saddle swaps are trivial and should be free (unless you go to a higher quality). Changing the handlebars and cranks take more time, so they might want to charge some labour for that.

All in all, you left out the key element: your size. If you are a 1.7 - 1.8-m woman, stay away from WSD designs, because they are almost always made for short to medium size women. On the other hand, if you are a 1.4-1.6 m woman, the WSD frames could be the only ones that fit.


And BTW, for those who are 1.4 - 1.6 m men, than maybe a WSD frame would be a good starting point, with the LBS swapping in a man saddle and wider handlebars.
Good points all! Yes what I meant to say is this is how the manufacturers spec. the bikes different not that women all have those specific differences from men in every case. As with men, bikes for women should fit them well. It helps to know a competent (and trusted!) LBS sales person who can help out with bike fit.
jimhens714 is offline