Thread: Vitus 979
View Single Post
Old 05-12-08, 11:15 AM
  #20  
davidwaller
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Morgantown, PA
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
This is BF you putz, not the U.S. Supreme Court. On BF, money talks, bull****...also talks. Except I had this bike (a nifty blue one, pretty bike), and dumped it because it was far too noodly for me, and I'm not exactly Mr. 1500 Watts. However, it's also true that most pro cycling teams routinely use bicycles that are foisted on them for sponsorship reasons that have little to do with the performance of the gear (this includes every brand, not just Vitus in the 1980's) and that the motor is 90% of the reason riders win races. Still, compared to the other bikes that were out there then and now, the Vitus was a crappy race bike.

But if this user doesn't care, isn't going to race, or likes crappy bikes, the Vitus might be ideal. What are you guys smoking here? Can I get some? I haven't had any of that since the 1980's either.
Maybe I shouldn't bother reading this forum then, if it's considered OK to just "make stuff up".
davidwaller is offline