View Single Post
Old 05-19-08 | 07:12 AM
  #21  
PaulH
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 106
From: Washington, DC
Originally Posted by daintonj
I really don't understand why you'd buy a bike like this. Why spend more money to get an technically antiquated old fashioned design when a cheap modern rigid mountain bike would be perfect?
If you were to buy a car with no electrical system, no fenders, a crazy exposed drivetrain that would eat your clothing, tires that went flat every few weeks, wheel-rim brakes, a Rube Goldberg transmission with little cable-operated arms that iced up in the winter, no way to carry cargo, a funny seating position that necessitated that the driver wear special clothing, and an expectation that every driver should be a mechanic and tinker for an hour or so a week, would you call the result "technically advanced?"

Note: I don't necessarily object to these limitations. In fact, the 1910 Mercer Raceabout meets much of the above description, and it's one of the cars I would love to own. I would not find it fully suitable for my trips to work or the store, however.

Paul
PaulH is offline  
Reply