Old 05-24-08 | 10:36 AM
  #8  
bbattle's Avatar
bbattle
.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Donating
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,769
Likes: 38
From: Rocket City, No'ala

Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose

Originally Posted by deadforkinglast
Well, if you use the dingle and a double to give yourself two different gears, you might be able to keep the chainline acceptable. For example, if you're using the 17t/21t dingle, try using 50 and 46 tooth chainrings in front. This setup would keep the same number of teeth engaged at any given time, meaning you wouldn't need to use a different length chain or move the wheel in the droouts. Am I right about this? I think I am. This way, you could have a gear for climbing or for riding into headwinds (46x21) and a gear for descending or riding on long flats (50x17). Now that I look at those ratios, that spacing seems a little wide, but you get the idea.

Yeah, if you keep the tooth count the same, the rear hub doesn't move. I've got a Sugino RD with a 48T ring so I bought a 44T ring, some new chainring bolts, 9-speed chain, and a 17-19 dingle. The 48-17 ~ to 42-15 that I'm used to and the 44-19 would be low enough to climb lots of stuff or carry a heavy load. I'll throw something else on the other side of the hub.

My Raleigh Sprite has some long dropouts but the Paramount has even longer ones. I think it'll be the Sprite that gets the nod. I think the C & V forum would kill me if I built a fixie out of the 1970 Paramount.

Pics coming soon.
bbattle is offline  
Reply