Originally Posted by
patentcad
They weren't shady with me, they were transparent like a Pella Window.
And they responded to every email promptly. Zero point zero problems. I'd like to know exactly how the member above concluded they were 'shady'? Maybe he's a child molester himself, you never know. Oh, you don't like baseless Internet bull****? Now you know how Bikes Direct feels when they read posts like yours.
Since when is claiming to be an old dead brand considered not being shady? And it doesn't matter if other companies do it too, it's still nonetheless shady. How hard can it be maintaining your old brand name?
Not to mention a terrible website.