Thread: Sustainability
View Single Post
Old 06-26-08 | 02:23 PM
  #11  
chingon77
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Hydrated
Wrong.

The gardeners were allowed to use the land at first because there was no loss to the owner. Then when he decided to use the land for his original purpose, the gardeners seemed to decide that they were now ENTITLED to stay without the owner's permission. All that the protesters did was to ensure that no land owner will ever do anything nice like this for others for fear that they will be demonized and abused by the very people that they tried to be kind to. The rightful landowner has lost millions of dollars because of the fiasco. And because his name is Horowitz, many of those kind and gentle community "farmers" have threatened his family and smeared him with antisemetic racial slurs.

Good job.
Yup, this is the party line that was given to the public. The racial slurs came from both directions. This kind of crap doesn't happen by chance because fiasco's like these are created on a day to day basis and used against the public as propaganda and guides a certain agenda. Do you actually believe a big city land owner is really nice enough to let someone grow gardens on their plot of land without getting anything in return? HA! Yea right.
chingon77 is offline  
Reply