Originally Posted by
bexley
Totally illogical.
"If you have to use shorter cranks than optimal just in order to not have toe overlap with the front wheel, then the frame is too small for you. "
I kind of get what he's trying to say here (we are talking road geometry). If it was that one-in-a-million fit, where the crank is just nicking - the next size up frame might clear @ that same crank length. It would be like hitting the lottery.
Does that make sense?