Originally Posted by
Dahon.Steve
If the bicycle is stolen, the building's policy would reimburse the owner. However, if the the insurance does not cover bicycles, then the owner would have to pay out of his/her pocket.
So if anything at all got stolen, the building proprieter (or their insurance) is up for replacement? Seems to me movable property is the responsibility of the owner to insure, not the building they're entering.
Still weird, but perhaps that's standard in the US...?