Originally Posted by serious
Actually I do have some pictures of my bike (and a digital cam too). I tried to use the "Manage pictures" feature to upload them and it simply did not work (even though it said that the pictures have been uploaded)

Unfortunately I don't have a hosting web site to link to, so I decided to provide the link to the Trek site where they have pictures and specs instead.
You just have locate where the pictures are on your hard drive. The default directory to store pictures on windows XP is:
C:\Documents and Settings\MingY\My Documents\My Pictures. If you cannot locate your pictures in that directory, I would find out what your camera names its files, and use the search feature that comes with windows.
There are many free sites that will host pictures, such as geocities, or anglefire. You could also search for free picture hosting on google.
Originally Posted by serious
1) The carbon frame provides a much less harsh ride. Coupled with full suspension, it is soooo much easier on the body (remember that I am 42 years old). Even though I am in good shape, train constantly and try to eat well, long, tehcnical rides take their toll. I ride as much as 3.5 hours (mostly advanced and expert single track). The Fuel is forgiving on the body, no doubt.
The carbon frame was one of the things that drawn me to the bike, but I was concerned about its durability since I am somewhat a newbie and do crash occassionally. Coming from a totally rigid bike, the full suspension on my Rocky definitely helps a lot.
Originally Posted by serious
2) The Fuel's shock (Fox Float RL Pro Pedal) is amazing. I detect almost no bob, yet it hooks up extremely well when climbing over rough terrain or roots. No more bouncing over rough stuff and losing traction. I love the way this bike climbs. Period. But I think a big/heavy person would feel much more bob. The Pro Pedal setup is for lightweights mostly (I weigh 160 lbs).
Otherwise, it is a smooth, efficient 25.6 lbs bike (with the Selle Italia Trans-Am saddle and Crank Brothers Candy pedals I added), which is ideal for XC and tehnical trails. Another interesting thing is that the cockpit is more "relaxed" than the Norco Nitro. The Fuel comes with a short stem (80mm) and wider (31.8) bar. The steering is not as aggressive as you would expect, which is better for technical rides.
I am very fortunate to have this bike. It costs way too much, but the ride quality and the fun factor help ease the pain.

Sounds like you found a bike that's made for you! Make sure you enjoy it and show some some pictures!
Ming