Originally Posted by
Quickbeam
No need to apologize. I'm not offended in the least. I just wanted to weigh in with my $0.02. For many years I rode almost eclusively in full lycra kit because I kind of felt like I had to in order to be considered a real cyclist. In the early ninties I owned a Bridgestone RB-2 and was a "Bridgestone Owner's Bunch" (BOB) member, so I was on the original, introductory Rivendell mailing list. When I first looked at their bikes and their approach (I think it was in 1996) it looked really "dorky" to me and I thought Grant had gone off the deep end. Over the years it gradually became more and more appealling and I started inching more and more in that direction. Now I have two Rivs and I never wear lycra. I have no problems with folks who prefer to wear lycra when they ride and I'll even concede that it has it advantages. I just wanted to point out that the Rivendell approach isn't just a bunch of hooey.
In that case you can clean my house for penance.
I'm a bit of a stubborn jacka## who has done his own thing most of my life. Doing something because it is expected of me is just odd. It does happen but not with cycling. At least that is what I believe.