View Single Post
Old 11-11-04 | 10:05 AM
  #26  
trirmk's Avatar
trirmk
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: PA

Bikes: Quattro Assi & Trek 7000

Originally Posted by kingkelly
Everyone keeps saying that cycling eats away at fat and muscle mass, but im wondering why? Shouldnt the use of your arms and legs produce more muscle? adn even if you dont use much upper body during rides, wouldnt it just not affect muscle?

Just wondering...
Who's this everyone person you're talking about? Any exercise will tear down/damage muscle mass if the exercise is intense enough, but cycling "eating away" at fat and muscle...makes it sound like such a negative thing.

True, cycling will use fat as a substrate for energy production, so that could be considered "eating away" at the fat. At low intensities, your body will preferentially use fat as a fuel, but that use of fat will diminish more as you increase the intensity. With long, especially ultra-endurance, events, you will have a breakdown of muscle mass (i.e. protein contributing to energy production) due to damage and fuel utilization.

The actual breaking down of muscle is good because as long as you're recovering properly, you will build and repair muscle...this is what makes you stronger, bigger, etc. But if you're only cycling, it's highly doubtful that you'll see an increase in muscle mass, or even a large loss in muscle mass due to damage or tearing down of muscle, because of the nature of the sport. To really produce more muscle, strength train in the gym.
trirmk is offline  
Reply