View Single Post
Old 08-15-08 | 08:36 PM
  #91  
BSLeVan
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
From: S.E. Pennsylvania, USA
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
FACTS are what actually has HAPPENED! I can't explain it much simpler to you than that!

Why would you ASSume, I remember some story about an ORANGE, when I NEVER heard it?

I guess that's your version of "facts".

Until you have experimented with different length cranks AND the subtle gear changes appropriate to those different length cranks, you are simply guessing about what the best length is!
I've made up a custom cassette from 2 different cassettes. Thus I have the ability to fine tune my gear ratios VS crank length. I've probably made 4-5 minor changes to get the cassette dialed in for MY riding. That will probably change in the Winter, when it's colder & windier.
So far, I've used 175, 170 & 160MM cranks.
The 175's are definitely too long for my bad knee, as explain in the original post.
I'm slightly faster on the 160's than the 170's, but they seem to feel a bit too short. I hoping some 165's get left on my doorstep by the crank fairy. Then I can wonder if 162.5 or 167.5 is better
Budget constraints prevent me from buying some. (My 160's were $7.50 +S&H)
Bill, you really ought to watch the name calling and read my first post in this thread. I have experimented with different length crank arms. I was simply trying to point out that the same crank length will not be experienced the same way by people with different perspectives. Of course, there are those who think their perspective is the only one.
BSLeVan is offline  
Reply