Thread: Fargo
View Single Post
Old 09-07-08 | 12:08 PM
  #15  
JiveTurkey's Avatar
JiveTurkey
Low car diet
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 4
From: Corvallis, OR, USA

Bikes: 2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.

Originally Posted by bikinpolitico
I'm not meaning to dis' 29ers, I'm just saying the bike industry tends to grab a particular segment each year and pump it up for application they were not meant for. Ubiquitous carbon and fixed gear bikes also come to mind on this front.

I would say for fire roads, I think a more traditional touring bike with 32MM or larger tires would be fine. 700c wheels give you a lot more options right now than 29ers, so I guess I'm saying that I don't understand the need. I could be wrong. This appears to be an experiment in the market so we'll see where it goes.
I hope everyone here knows that 29" and 700c have the same 622mm bead-seat diameter. The only real difference is the width of the rim to handle different ranges of tire widths. 29er rims are essentially 700c rims with a similar width of a 26" MTB rim.

Though I've never owned a 29" MTB, the one thing I like about them is that rim diameters are becoming standardized to the 622mm BSD. But, now 650B is starting to get thrown into the mix.
JiveTurkey is offline  
Reply