Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,811
Likes: 596
From: NJ, NYC, LI
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
The Kent folder has a couple of problems.
One is the frame design, with the BB attached behind the seat tube; this makes for rather bad ergodynamics. I can't imagine why they did this. It can't be fixed.
Another is that it's hard to get both the seat high enough and the handlebar low enough; the designer of this bike, like many folding bikes, thinks people are short and want insanely high handlebars. The taller rider will be bothered by the low seat; the shorter rider will be bothered by the high handlebar. Somewhere between the two there may be a rider for whom the bike can be fixed but, depending whether you have the right parts in the bin, it may be expensive.
Finally there's the gearing. The six-speed derailleur is the worst; all six of them are too low. The Nexus-3 is great improvement. I have a six-speed that I have modified to a three speed (sturmey archer) and can attest that improving the gearing in this way more or less fixes the problem.
Bottom line, I think, is the Nexus 3 speed hub fixes the worst of the bike's problems but, obviously, doesn't address the others.
I should add, I really like the Kent's unusually short (152 mm) crank arms; most bikes come with 170 mm arms, which I find too long.