Thread: Lug Analysis
View Single Post
Old 09-16-08 | 03:28 PM
  #8  
Picchio Special
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 15
From: Lancaster County, PA

Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis

Originally Posted by sailorbenjamin
There's also a difference between cast lugs and stamped lugs but I don't really know much about it. I think the cast ones are usually better.
Cast lugs are a labor-saving element in frame construction. Stamped and/or hand-cut lugs take a great deal of time and labor to clean up, thin, and generally make them look good. So if what you treasure about vintage bikes is that they are handbuilt craft objects, then stamped lugs are "better." Especially if one finds their inevitable imperfections charming rather than irritating. There are folks within the vintage bike community who greatly prefer bikes built before about 1982 precisely because they tended to use stamped lugs and involved more hand labor (myself, for example); there are also plenty of folks who don't care a whit (or even prefer the cast lugs).
Picchio Special is offline  
Reply