View Single Post
Old 09-24-08 | 11:39 AM
  #13  
knucklehead
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by valygrl
I think low weight, low cost per day and comfort are a balancing act - you can get any two at the cost of the other one.

When you add trip duration into the mix, I usually choose:

short trip: weight = low, comfort - medium-high , cost/day = high (credit card tour, stay in hotels, eat in restaurants, carry minimal clothes & almost no food)

long trip: weight = high, cost/day = low, comfort = medium-high (camp in campgrounds, cook, carry lots of clothes for all contingencies, carry music, maps, book, chair)

I have never managed to sacrifice the comfort on my trips - it's important to me. But if you want, you can get low cost and low weight by being a very minimalist camper, eat out of grocery stores and not restaurants, carry minimal clothes, go dirty a lot (no showers, few changes of clothes)

there are hostels at Pigeon Point, Santa Cruz and Monterey, you could put together a lovely tour if you go south, and not have to camp. Or you can camp at Santa Cruz, BIg Basin, Aptos, Monterey, Big Sur (several places), Pinnacles National Monument... I did something a lot like this, but in the other direction:

http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/?...nd&context=all

and it was fantastic. Don't ride nacamiento road on a fixie, though - really steep.

You can find a million gear lists on crazyguyonabike.

Have fun!!!
this was a wonderfully insightful post, valygrl, and i appreciate it. i'm very much of a list-maker (aka OCD), and these varying considerations based on primary goal are right up my alley.

i'll make sure and take your nacamiento advice -- as i told nun above, i'm NOT looking to blow out my knees. i just wanna get away from it all for a minute.

the southern route sounds like a definite future plan for me, and the crazyguyonabike link was really helpful, so thanks!
knucklehead is offline  
Reply