Old 09-28-08 | 03:59 PM
  #8  
stevo9er
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Machka
Seems to me that's not actually true, according to a study a few years ago.
Well he is technically pretty much right, he just said it differently.

Originally Posted by Wikipedia

The primary cause of rolling resistance is hysteresis:

A characteristic of a deformable material such that the energy of deformation is greater than the energy of recovery. The rubber compound in a tire exhibits hysteresis. As the tire rotates under the weight of the vehicle, it experiences repeated cycles of deformation and recovery, and it dissipates the hysteresis energy loss as heat. Hysteresis is the main cause of energy loss associated with rolling resistance and is attributed to the viscoelastic characteristics of the rubber.

-- National Academy of Sciences[3]

Thus materials that flex more and bounce back slowly, such as rubber, exhibit more rolling resistance than materials that flex less, such as steel, or that bounce back more quickly, such as silica. Low rolling resistance tires typically incorporate silica in place of carbon black in their tread compounds to reduce low-frequency hysteresis without compromising traction.[4]
Basically the more air in your tire = less deformation = greater efficiency. How much? Who knows. Not me.
stevo9er is offline  
Reply