Old 09-29-08 | 11:05 AM
  #35  
jccaclimber
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 133
From: SFBay

Bikes: n, I would like n+1

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
No kidding. Ok, 50kph is pretty quick race speed but starting there and going up to 70kph? Sounds like technical descending to me. I think overall mass would trump aerodynamics in that case.

The technology is interesting but absolutely useless on a bicycle. They should talk to the moto folks, maybe?
It sounds like their reynolds number needed to be just a bit higher to get the laminar turbulent transition they needed, and so they bumped their speed to get that. It would be interesting to do smoke trails on a bike in the real world, or put a bike in a rolling wind tunnel rather than on a stand in a static one. It seems that all the constant adjustment you do riding would make the flow more turbulent than a tunnel shows it to be.
jccaclimber is offline  
Reply