Thread: Stiffness?
View Single Post
Old 10-14-08 | 08:37 AM
  #13  
challaday
Senior Member
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: Just this side of insanity.

Bikes: Too many

Originally Posted by waterrockets
Think about carbon fiber wind chimes vs. steel wind chimes. The CF would "thunk" rather than ring because it's absorbing the impact energy from the striking object.
I'm not a rocket scientist or a physicist, but aren't both those examples a form of energy loss? The CF "absorbing" energy and the steel transforming the energy into sympathetic vibrations that eminate as noise? I think the difference would be that the energy that the CF loses happens very rapidly and the energy that the steel loss happens slowly.

For practical purposes though, I suggest a counterexample. I used to own a Vitus 979, which at the age of 18 was my "dream bike." I quickly discovered that I hated it. On every down stroke of the pedals, the entire BB, seat tube, down tube and chainstay interface would rock back and forth so that my chainrings would always rub on the front derailleur. In fact, if I really pushed hard (back when I used to have knees) I could actually get the front to shift off the large chainring.

I discovered that stiffness is important in bicycles, and yes there are differences among frames and tubing materials.
challaday is offline  
Reply