Originally Posted by
apricissimus
Did you read the thread cited by the OP?
In that thread I stated that no child was put in danger by passing a stopped bus (with lights on) ten feet on the right, while no child was actually present. I'm not anxious to save 5 or 10 or 60 or 120 seconds, I was just saying that the OP of the bus thread didn't do anything drastically wrong since no children were in any danger.
So because he didn't hit a child that means the OP didn't do anything wrong? What if his actions were the same but a child walked off the bus and the OP collided with them? would he still not have done anything drastically wrong? (guessing also of course that above actions are probably contrary to the HTA in the OPs jurisdiction) His actions were the same.
The argument that he didn't do anything wrong because the OP didn't collide with anyone is invalid.