View Single Post
Old 10-27-08, 05:53 AM
  #5  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Gear ratio is fine (really all these measures are fine!), but it depends on what you're trying to accomplish. If you're just trying to see if the distribution of gears is even and what the best gear shifting progression is, any measure should work as long as you have criteria for deciding what's good. If you're trying to estimate leg effort (pedal force, power, aerobic load, or ??), fitting crank length into the mix is worthwhile. But if you don't think an objective analysis of effort is meaningful, which I don't, then spread is what's important, and effort is judged subjectively. That's what I mean when I say gain ratios or gear ratios are not useful for me.

Road Fan
Road Fan is offline