View Single Post
Old 12-22-08 | 05:49 PM
  #25  
EvilV
Bicycling Gnome
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 1
From: 55.0N 1.59W
Originally Posted by Pocko
I see the beauty and simplicity of the idea. The photo is intriguing and obviously military in nature. Strapping a bike on one's back is practical through flights or stairs or any area where hauling a foldie would be too much work...

... but somehow I still can't get over the oddity of bikes riding people as opposed to people riding bikes?

.
For non-mechanised infantry of the mid 20th century, the bliss of being able to pedal for many tens of miles rather than walk carrying your gear under a hot sun would make carrying the bike on some occasions eminently worthwhile, I'd say. I've been walking across Spain in stages as a project. It gets damned hard on the feet. I have very much envied the cyclists who have breezed past me at twenty miles an hour when I was stumbling along downhill at 3 with a sore back and my gear chaffing at my shoulders. I think that pushing and even carrying the bike on some stretches would have been worth the trouble.



By the way - I was wondering why they weren't riding those bikes in that kind of terrain, but on reflection, and thinking about the era of the pictures, they were probably single speed bikes with a gear ratio of about 56 inches. You could't ride far cross country on that kind of gearing. My atb goes down to about 20 inches and you could ride that on such a landscape.

Last edited by EvilV; 12-22-08 at 06:13 PM.
EvilV is offline  
Reply