Flame you? Not at all. You believe that a government sponsored test is indicative of a privilege and not a right.

Perhaps you forget the Jim Crow laws of the past. One of those was a test...to vote. Another one was a poll tax. Those were ruled unconstitutional.

As for money, or lack thereof, indicating a right vs. a privilege that is simply incorrect. You don't need money to drive. You don't need to own a vehicle to have a driver's license.

A government sponsored/sanctioned test means nothing with regards to a privilege vs. a right. That has been proven to the Supreme Court in the past. We will get there eventually over the driving "privilege"/"right" eventually.