Thread: romanticism
View Single Post
Old 12-30-04 | 12:35 AM
  #40  
bostontrevor's Avatar
bostontrevor
Retrogrouch in Training
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,484
Likes: 1
From: Knee-deep in the day-to-day
Originally Posted by stickerguy
I once read this study that said that the environmental impact of city dwellers compared to suburban dwellers is A LOT less. So if you can't be all grizzly adams then you mine as well live in chicago; screw the 'burbs (I agree!)jeff
It's true. Likewise, for all their environmental posturing, the average left-coaster uses about 2x as much energy on a daily basis as the typical east-coaster. However, the entire comparison is predicated on a typical urban/suburban lifestyle: wired into the electrical and phone grid, indoor plumbing, sewage connection, automobile commuting, etc. I don't know of any comparison between a completely off-the-grid non-motorized lifestyle and a high-density urban dweller's impact. It doesn't mean they haven't been done, but they're not the usually touted comparison.

However, if such a comparison did exist, I wouldn't be at all surprised if it favored the high-density urbanite. Economies of scale and whatnot. Burning peat and crapping into the nearest stream are pretty dirty activities.
bostontrevor is offline  
Reply