View Single Post
Old 12-31-04 | 11:35 AM
  #5  
sydney's Avatar
sydney
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,428
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by T-Mar
Rule of thumb for the locknut is that it must have a minimum of three full turns of engagement. It sounds like you are just shy of that. Rather than replacing the headset, the most cost effective option is to search out a thinner lockwasher. A lockwasher that is one millimetre thinner than your current lockwasher should gain you about an extra full turn. The most drastic solution would be to mill a half millimetre off of the top and bottom of your headtube.

Good luck in finding a headset with a smaller stack height. My experience with the relatively modern Shimano headsets is that they have the smallest stack heights. This crafty engineering trick pretty much forces the owner to use Shimano when it's time for replacement. It also means that a Shimano headset can usually be fitted as a replacement for any other headset by shortening the steerer tube, which is a rerlatively simple operation. Once you've done that, your are tied to Shimano. They pretty much tied tied up the aftermarket headsets for a while with this approach. Hopefully, the other manufacturers have caught on and matched their stack heights.
A HS can be assembled without the washer between the locknuts. It just takes two good HS wrenches. I suppose one could even mill some off the top of the adjusting cup rather than the headtube, depending on how much there is to work with.The current shimanos have a 37.5 stack height.Ritchey and Trange are among current ones inthe QBP with a lower stack.There use to be alot more options. I just hate it when threaded steerers are cut to exactly fit the HS being used. No harm in using a 5mm spacer to make life easier, in case that HS goes out of print.
sydney is offline  
Reply