Originally Posted by
helloamerican
and jabba, i think you and i actually agree.
To be honest, I'm basically playing Devil's Advocate. I think that bike, as is, is jackass. My point is and always has been that no bike is inherently jackass, that no matter how god awful a bike may be, there is always something you can adjust or replace to make it well again. That is why I object to the "other than the
x, y and
z that bike is fine" line of reasoning. I agree, it would be fine,
but it isn't.