Originally Posted by patentcad

You do realize Waldo that you could post 9 page rationalizations and a 5 year price increase from $1300 to $2100 will make everyone think Zipp is just charging what the market will bear. Nothing wrong with that, but why not just say 'our costs would have warranted an increase to $1600, but as long as the OCP morons out there will pay $2100, why not?'

That I can get behind.