Originally Posted by sydney
Maybe that depends on the definition of 'good'. But I have never seen one.. There probably isn't $2 saved in using hi-ten over basic cromo and then there is the stigma associated with it in the marketpalce. Back in the mid 90s a number of entry level road bikes from some of the bigger makers were made with Hi-ten or generic cromo with hi-ten stays. Best that was ever said about them was 'ok for the money'. And that was probably being charitable.
You sound like a Republican. If I had the money, I'd probably own something other than a Saturn sedan. But you know what? My Saturn is a pretty OK car for the money and I think that's a good thing. In years past, I rode some pretty marginal bikes (I wish that my first tandem had a Hi-Ten frame) but they were the best that I could afford at the time and I was on the road having fun. What's "not good" about that?
Road biking can be a pretty unforgiving sport. If your bike's not good enough, people skoff. If your bike is too good for the speed that you are able to ride, people skoff. Wrong clothes, people skoff. If you completely match your jersey, shorts, helmet and bike, people skoff. You'll never satisfy the skoffers so you might as well satisfy yourself. The nice thing about my crummy bike era was that I learned to ignore the skoffers.