View Single Post
Old 02-07-09 | 06:24 AM
  #19  
flatlander_48's Avatar
flatlander_48
Cathedral City, CA
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 2
From: Cathedral City, CA

Bikes: 2016 RITCHEY BreakAway (full Chorus 11), 2005 Ritchey BreakAway (full Chorus 11, STOLEN), 2001 Gary Fisher Tassajara mountain bike (sold), 2004 Giant TRC 2 road bike (sold)

Originally Posted by RacerX
I wasn't insulting you. I was insulting the product. It is designed without real thought to the mechanics of the knee.
The reason mtb Q factor is wider is for the triple crank. They also try to keep the Q factor on mtb as narrow as possible. If they could make mtb Q factor more narrow, they would.

If you want to equal the Q factor, get a wider bottom bracket. Pulling your feet out to exaggerate a knee problem isn't going to help you, but go ahead and try it if you want. It won't damage your components.
No, No, No...

Grasshopper should Think Before Speaking.

I have arthritic ankles. One foot is about 10deg out, the other maybe 15deg. When you ride clipless, the distance between the ball of your feet is fixed. Either I twist my knees to force my feet to be closer to being parallel or my heels are almost into the spokes. F+++ Q-factor. It is meaningless for me. The choices are:
  • Hurt my knees
  • Catch my heels in the spokes
  • Ride with flat pedals
  • Quit cycling
  • Buy KneeSavers extenders or pedal extenders from High Sierra

I have experience with both KneeSavers and the product from High Sierra Cycling. They are essentially the same thing: a chunk of stainless round stock with a male pedal thread on one end, a female on the other and 2 wrench flats.

There is another thread on this issue, to which I also contributed:

http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=370582
flatlander_48 is offline  
Reply