Originally Posted by
tonyzackery
What's ridiculous about investigating suspected cheaters?
What's wrong with casting aspersions based on circumstantial evidence? For example, from your post, we can conclude that you think everyone in pro cycling is a witch, and that means you are a Grand Inquisitor, a sadist, a pervert, and a nut job. What's ridiculous about that assumption?
Now you know how some of these cyclists feel.