View Single Post
Old 02-21-09, 02:55 AM
  #18  
meb
Senior Member
 
meb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: arlington, VA
Posts: 1,764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
Well considering that weight and road-bumps load the seatpost vertically along its axis, I doubt a CF post would compress any more than an alloy post (which is basically nil). The flex you're experiencing and that your teammates are seeing is lateral flex due to your weight and leg muscles pushing on the post. A seatpost is much, much more flexible laterally across its axis than along it, so a lightweight CF would probably flex more for the same lateral load.

Yea, I'd say go with a more stout alloy post. You'd never feel the 50-100gm weight difference, but you can definitely feel the difference in lateral rigidity.

I've never owned a CF seatpost but before your statement would've thought they would have been designed to flex in the axis of the seatpost to cushion the rider. What is the reason they design the flex in the lateral rather than longitudinal direction?
meb is offline