Originally Posted by
darksiderising
You assumed that you know something about my qualifications to offer some advice. That advice was contained in a sarcastic response, just like your sarcastic response quoted in this post. I'm going to go out on a limb and assume (uh oh!) that you were bullied a bit in school, and you are oversensitive when someone pokes fun at others, hence your very silly reply.
Whatever the case, I am glad that you have it in you to stand up for someone else over the internet. It shows great strength, courage, and moral responsibility.
I suppose that I should not that the second paragraph (and maybe more) should be read in a sarcastic tone. I wouldn't want to leave you on your own to assume how to read it.
Show me where I said I know something about your qualifications.
I said "everyone who scored better than a D in Psych 101". Guess what, smart-ass, that includes everyone who got a D+ throught to A+. It includes everyone who gave up psychology after that class, as well as everyone who went on to get a PhD in psychology, or multiple PhDs, and everything in between. In fact, the only way I could be wrong about my assumption is if you either never took Psych 101 or scored lower than a D.
As far as assumptions go, I'd say that's a pretty safe bet.
Also, you're wrong about my school days. 0 for 2, Pavlov.