Originally Posted by halfspeed
I just don't get that. I don't read arrogance in his work, just a concise presentation of the facts as he sees them. If he's wrong, by all means, do the legwork and prove it. Maybe it's just that he writes like an engineer and I can relate to that.
You say I should do the legwork. If you read my post you would have seen that I never said he was wrong. The whole point of the post was how he presents his claims, not whether he is right or wrong. And then, you follow up with this very general criticism:
[/QUOTE]
But this is rapidly turning into a windy OT digression so I'll just say I disagree with you on almost every point and leave it at that.[/QUOTE]
How convienient
Any good engineer would take the time to be specific about his comments.