XzEn54321 - do you understand bostontrevor's response? He's voting NO for the same reason that you're voting YES: because "getting run over is not fun". (very clever, BT).

In other words, you seem to believe that bike lanes make it less likely for a cyclist to get run over, while BT believes bike lanes make it more likely for cyclists to be run over. I of course agree with BT. In essence, that's what the "Hey anti-bike laners... what's wrong with the picture" thread is all about, and I really don't want to rehash it here. I do hope to bring it to your attention however.

Many cyclists are unaware of all the arguments other cyclists have against bike lanes, and that thread covers many of them.

Serge