maybe i should ask you a question directly, roody, about this 'as far right as practicable' business....
what does "bikes keep as far right as practicable" mean to you?
a) bikes effectively must mandatorily share the lane?
b)bikes yield to faster traffic when it's safe?
or
c)bikes allowed full use of lane for safety if determined necessary by the bicyclist.
a,b, or c, roody? which more accurately describes what 'as far right as practicable' allows a cyclist?
i take issue with the gravely mistaken impressions of some that 'as far right as practicable' is effective mandatory lane sharing,' or like houstonb maligns ' yielding to faster traffic when safe'