Here's the thing, AFLD is not disputing the samples. They are NOT saying the samples
are tainted, positive, his ex wife's or anything about them. What they are saying is that he
broke the protocol.
I jokingly said it's Lance's word (and possibly Johan's) against the AFLD tester. Without concrete
evidence of what really happened in terms of whether the tester agreed Lance could take the shower
or not I can't see how this would stand up in CAS where it will end up anyway. The sad thing
to me is by the time CAS hears the case it might be too late for this years Tour.
As related by LA it's petty, as related by AFLD it's a violation of protocol. You make up your
own mind as to which is correct.

Marty