Old 04-21-09 | 04:42 PM
  #24  
Picchio Special
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 15
From: Lancaster County, PA

Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis

Originally Posted by sced
Hmmm, so would the "5mm drive-side offset the Campagnolo cranks require" put the drive crank 5mm too close to the face of the drive side fixed cup? Are the cartridge BB spindles symmetric about the sides of the cartridge faces?
I believe that's correct as to the offset - older Campagnolo bottom brackets designed for the offset are generally marked "+5" along with the (total) spindle length. The offset was designed to allow the cranks to clear the CPSC mandated front derailleur lip, I believe. I have no idea if a front derailleur swap could solve the issue or if there's more involved. You would also presumably have a left side crank that was more outboard than appropriate, given the same spindle length. But again, I'm not an expert in this type of thing- I keep hoping someone who knows this stuff cold will join the discussion and bail me out.
My understanding is that contemporary crankset designs use symmetrical bottom brackets, yes.
Picchio Special is offline  
Reply