i read your whole paragraph.

in sentence #2, you contrast a "self-defined modernist definition" with "the actual definition." where does one find this "actual definition" of anarchism? they only "defintion" that has any relevance to anarchists is the one that includes autonomy and egalitatarianism as critical attributes of anarchism. so what's the (your) "actual definition"?

in sentence #3, you say that there's "nothing anarchistic about being a humanist with idealistic philosophies." ok. i agree. however, i think there's certainly something humanistic about being an anarchist (and what philosophy isn't based on ideals?).