Originally Posted by
Dchiefransom
It's time to make the owner prove he was in Seattle. It's also time to put the girlfriend under oath and ask who was driving. Since it wasn't her, she's required to answer truthfully.
Not without proof that he wasn't, or specifically proof that he was where the bicyclist claims that he was. It is always the state's burden to prove their case first, not the other way around. I'd wonder if the police have done a check on any credit cards he may have and the activity that night?