View Single Post
Old 05-29-09 | 07:46 AM
  #9  
Road Fan's Avatar
Road Fan
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,195
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by duke_of_hazard
that is correct. Regarding direction, since Chicago is basically a grid pattern they could alternate directions every block.
Ok, it's a grid, but most of the neighborhoods have commercial/arterials spaced every half-mile. At the quarter miles you're in solidly residential areas often broken up by industrial clusters. Routing for cyclists becomes far more difficult, with much greater exposure to stop signs, street glass/debris, and the funky Chicago-style roundabouts. Cross-street visibility is far worse on these side streets where the brick three-story walk-ups are ubiquitous, due to unrestricted curb parking. And do drivers really stop at the ubiquitous stop signs? Plus in this Devon Avenue area there is so much double-parking to load/unload groceries and the family, that the BOL will not truly belong to the cyclist. And in this area and others, there is zero opportunity to widen the street. Then there's winter snow removal on the sidestreets ...

I'm mainly using Rogers Park as an example, but the same issues exist in many other parts of the city as well.

I think a better trade-off is public-service messages to drivers, to check for clearance before opening a door, and to know they are responsible for cyclist injury and equipment damage they may cause, AND to cyclists to be visible and vigilant. If it gets on TV and the local Net services, it might sink in better. It can also be an opportunity to establish minimum day/night cyclist visibility requirements, as well.

The best place to communicate to a huge range of drivers might be the back page of the newspaper, right with the Cubs, Sox, Bulls, Bears, and Hawks!
Road Fan is offline  
Reply