Old 06-07-09 | 10:02 AM
  #47  
degnaw's Avatar
degnaw
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 2
From: Bellevue, WA
Originally Posted by genec
Drawing the line is easy... the offender should not be allowed to operate a motor vehicle again... what more proof of lack of capability do we need than the death of others.

Driving is a granted privilege, and if the privilege cannot be undertaken with the utmost responsibility, then it should be revoked.

The "proof" in this situation is the death of others...
The death of others is a sign of bad luck, not necessarily lack of capability. I for one have ridden straight into the back of a parked car (my pannier went into my tire, so I looked back); this could have easily been an elderly pedestrian. Is it only luck that separates picking myself up and riding away, and having to walk everywhere the rest of my life?

In a perfect world, people never get distracted, tired or make wrong decisions. However, this is not the case. Sure, driving or riding negligently should have greater penalties than they have today, but that should be based on what the driver did, not what the result of what he did was.
degnaw is offline  
Reply