I'm not posting any misinformation here, so I guess you take issue with me assuming that others might have initially thought the same way as I did?

To summarize: I incorrectly assumed that a constant wind on an out and back course would have less effect than it actually does. I thought about it and did some reading, and understood why I was wrong. I posted my thoughts and a link for others that might have been curious about the subject.

Despite my acknowledgement that my initial assumption was incorrect and an attempt to provide the correct information to any others that might be curious, you decided it was appropriate to mock me for thinking the way that I did ( even though I had already stated that I realized it was incorrect ).

Are you arguing that I shouldn't have thought that way in the first place? Do you instantly know everything there is to know about a subject when you are first introduced to it?