View Single Post
Old 06-11-09 | 02:25 PM
  #10  
stapfam's Avatar
stapfam
Time for a change.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,913
Likes: 7
From: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Originally Posted by 2wheeladdict
Not in all cases.
Take XT or Ultegra derailleurs for example. If I get more then two seasons out of these I am lucky.
XTR and Dura Ace on the other hand have lasted me for many years.

Edited to add: I worked for a bicycle drivetrain manufacture for years and witness this first hand over and over again. Some derailleur products do wear better then others for a variety of reasons.

As a marker- for performance- then LX or 105 parts are the standard to work from. Below these grades and you do get a lowering of life or performance if you are a hard rider. Personally- I ride XT and Ultegra. The parts are slightly lighter and do have better bearing surfaces to make them last longer and have that all important "Quality" factor. However- I have one bike that is hard on parts. An offroad Tandem that is used aggressively. This thing breaks and wears out parts just by rolling it out of the shed. A rear XT mech for example will have to be changed every year due to wear. Couple of years ago I got a deal on an XTR R'D' and there is no way I would normally fit this grade due to cost. However- It was a last years model and a low price so went for it. When it wears out I will be getting another one. Rear deraillers do take a lot of punishment so this upgrade was worth it.

If I were buying replacement parts for the MTB's or Road bikes- then I would go for XT or Ultegra. But if a deal came up for Dure Ace or XTR- then I would go for it again.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Reply