Here's a question I've been pondering lately.
One of the points of contention in any doping allegation is that the rider in question
always out performs other riders who are doping (i.e. Lance vs Vino vs Jan etc. etc.).
It's a logical question of how can one rider be 'better' than any number of riders who are doping.
With the recent treatment of Fignon for cancer and the discussion of his doping (admitted). I have
to wonder what this does to Greg's statement that he was always clean. By the above
one would have to question how he could beat Fignon when he (Fignon) was doping. . .
live by the sword, die by the sword.

Marty