View Single Post
Old 06-15-09 | 07:50 PM
  #14  
dsh's Avatar
dsh
Oh, you know...
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
From: DC

Bikes: '74 Schwinn Sports Tourer (Polo), S-Works E5 Team Festina (Chorus 11), Trek 2200 Bonded Carbon (Fixed), Trek 920 (7 speed IGH), Chesini Olimpiade SL (1x7)

Originally Posted by icelemmings
This has probably been discussed to death: what is the benefit of riding either 32-12 or 40-15 (the GI are the same for both options). I'll take my road bike out tomorrow evening and compare two similar GI ratios, but for now, any quick answers?
I would guess - and just common sense speaking - that more teeth (40-15 over 32-12) distributes wear more, and so will last a bit longer.

Also common sense, the difference in lifespan will be pretty negligible.

Conversely, smaller cogs/chainrings will be a couple grams lighter. Kinda reaching there, but yeah.

I'm not sure if there are more inherent efficiency gains between the two.
dsh is offline  
Reply