View Single Post
Old 06-26-09 | 02:34 AM
  #4  
PDR
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 575
Likes: 2
From: Cheshire, North West England, UK

Bikes: Brompton S2L-X, Bridgestone Moulton, 1963 & 1966 Moultons, Scott Mountain bike

Originally Posted by Aguila281
Hi guys,

Today I went for (another) test ride with a Brompton, and yes I'm really falling in love with these babies.

One of the most difficult decisions is the handlebar type.
An M-type has a short reach and makes me feel I'm going to be flung over the bike doing an emergency stop.
The S-type is way too low (I'm 1m88, with 93cm inseam. This means I'll be using a telescopic seat tube. An S- is way too sporty for town.
A P-type seems te be a good compromise, more reach and good handlebar height.

Could I swap the P-type handlebar with an M-type if I wanted better grips? How do they compare in height (measured from the stem to top of bar)? How much total height would lost in this conversion?

Has anyone tried putting a handlebar with some serious rise (say about 80-90mm) on an S-type? S-types have even more reach forward. But I could do with some 5-6 cms more handlebar height for my neck

Thanks tweekers!

Luca
NO! The S-Type bars are PERFECT for riding busy streets and great for the city centre where people walk in the middle of the road. The S-type bars give the bike great agility.

I would agree though that the S-type is the “sports” version, The P-type is the tourer and the M-type is for sedate, relaxed riders.


I did try a bike with M bars once but I found the S-type far more comfortable and a dammed site better looking too.

Last edited by PDR; 06-26-09 at 02:37 AM.
PDR is offline  
Reply