Originally Posted by
dodge_mich
This was always my take on that rule (which I do follow):
Since pedestrians are generally going much slower that bike or auto traffic, this makes the pedestrian much more aware traffic that would impact them and give them a greater chance to move out of the flow of traffic or to take evasive action as needed.
A 25mph car or bike will come up on a 5mph walker very quickly, compared to a 20mph cycle. Likewise, a 20mph cycle can blend with traffic much better...
Haven't we heard wrong-way-bike-riders say the same thing?
What was the counter argument against them(i forget the specifics)... and would that apply to joggers as well?