View Single Post
Old 02-17-05 | 04:02 PM
  #20  
Avalanche325's Avatar
Avalanche325
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena, CA

Bikes: Litespeed Firenze / GT Avalanche

Originally Posted by Brett 12
No.......No........No.....

In fact a Compact with 11-21 is like have 11 speed cluster (16 progressions/non redundant gears ) compared to a double with a 10 speed cluster (14 non redundant gears). Although some would say 14 is enough.....compact is also lighter and more aerodynamic (although diffrerence is small ....every bit counts)

Not a 7 speed cluster like you said (aka 14 speed).....Like I said It's more like an 11 speed cluster.

Lectron, here is a gear calculator..http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/ plug in 11-21 and 50/34 for chainrings.
The purpose of having multiple chainrings in NOT to have a big succession of sequential gears. It is for having multiple "speed ranges". That way you are shifting the rear a lot and RARELY shifting the front. Trying to use all of the gears in sequence is not what it was designed for.

I like the triple idea. Three speed ranges and a tight cassette. A compact gives up your high gears. If you don't use them, fine. If you pedal when you descend (I do), then 52-11 is nice to have.
Avalanche325 is offline  
Reply