I'm going to assume that we're all cyclists here, so those of you that oppose red light and/or speeding cameras answer honestly.

You're run down by a hit & run driver that ran a red while speeding, you're quadraplegic - never to ride or even walk again and never to hold down a full time job again due to the brain injury, and the camera which was the only witness snapped the pictures that proves your case. Would you demand that the DA not press charges and you not pursue the driver for compensation on the basis of the photographic evidence of what the hit-run driver did to you?

Be honest.